Welcome to our website. It is generaly simplier version of wikipedia. You will find there selected articles. Enjoy!
 |
This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion. Essays are not Wikipedia policies. |
 |
This page in a nutshell: Essays can be searched in several ways. This essay lists over 800 other essays, to allow searching the titles and added keywords. New essays auto-index in group "W". |
There are over 1000 Wikipedia essays (Feb 2010), with over a dozen categories to separate them for searching. The titles are listed below, to allow searching for particular words/syllables in titles. After many titles, some keywords have been added in parentheses "( )" such as "(verifiability)" to help find that topic.
So, to search essays, use:
-
- text-search of the titles (below) for a match; or
- text-search of keywords (added below) for a match; or
- perhaps use wiki-search Special:Search, including words "Wikipedia essays" (with your other search-words) to hunt a topic inside an essay (but it matches many non-essays).
- see essays in Category:Wikipedia essays (currently 1,295 pages).
- look for new essays auto-indexed under "Wikipedia:...".
By default, new essays indexed into the "W" group, as the default category placement by "{{essay}}" (during 2008). Also, many essays are merely half-page initial thoughts.
The age-old concept of "associative retrieval" has led to search engines that can scan page contents for multi-word matches. Some text editors, decades ago, could search for multiple words within a bracket of lines, but today, most people just use a search engine to find multiple words on a local webpage (that has been submitted to a world search-engine for indexing). Perhaps, some decade, many computers will search for a multi-word bracket on any selected pages. Fortunately, the wiki-search option (in the Wikipedia leftside menu), allows multiword search of pages, but it takes a lot of experience to pinpoint a search.
List of Wikipedia essays
The following list came from Category:Wikipedia_essays (10-Dec-2008), sorted into alpha order. Some entries might be bogus, incorrectly linked to the category. Other essays might still be stubs that have not been moved back to the particular user-space for improvement. (Essays here are intended to be readable & valuable for general Wikipedians.)
0–9
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
- Wikipedia:NPOV in userboxes
- Wikipedia:Name mush by culture (name variations, diminutives, conjugation, declension, official titles)
- Wikipedia:Namechecking (name or product placement)
- Wikipedia:Nationality of people from the United Kingdom
- Wikipedia:Navigation templates (navboxes, navigation boxes)
- Wikipedia:Negative energy (discouraging work)
- Wikipedia:Negotiation (compromise)
- Wikipedia:Neighborhood watch
- Wikipedia:Net positive (on adminiship requests and the candidates likely risk/reward ratio to Wikipedia)
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Examples (NPOV samples)
- Wikipedia:Neutrality templates
- Wikipedia:Newbie tests (new users, new editors)
- Wikipedia:Newbies aren't always clueless
- Wikipedia:Newcomers aren't all clueless
- Wikipedia:News agencies and fair use
- Wikipedia:News articles (recent events)
- Wikipedia:No Blurry Images (photo/image quality)
- Wikipedia:No Ethnic Epithets
- Wikipedia:No Trees needed to be chopped!
- Wikipedia:No angry mastodons (don't use fight or flight)
- Wikipedia:No angry mastodons just madmen (do use fight or flight)
- Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
- Wikipedia:No consensus (consensus building)
- Wikipedia:No excessive literalism
- Wikipedia:No fixed rules (ignore all rules)
- Wikipedia:No get out of jail free cards (no special treatment for seniority or past efforts)
- Wikipedia:No one cares about your garage band (notability)
- Wikipedia:No one really cares (apathy)
- Wikipedia:No original biographies (verifiability, vanity pages)
- Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article (requirements)
- Wikipedia:No soliciting of cliques (canvasing)
- Wikipedia:No vested contributors (conflict of interest)
- Wikipedia:No-edit orders (proper messages to restrict editing)
- Wikipedia:No-no (reason cited is not policy, seek consensus)
- Wikipedia:Non serviam (reasons to not serve as admin/janitor)
- Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria (Human Readable Version)
- Wikipedia:Non-free content/FAQ (copyright law)
- Wikipedia:Not all sources are created equal (reliable sources)
- Wikipedia:Not every IP is a vandal (vandalism, IP addresses)
- Wikipedia:Not ready for primetime
- Wikipedia:Notability/Historical/Essay
- Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)/2008 proposal
- Wikipedia:Notability (geography)
- Wikipedia:Notability (high schools)
- Wikipedia:Notability (populated places) (failed)
- Wikipedia:Notability (populated places) (failed) 2
- Wikipedia:Notability (science)/Irrelevant arguments
- Wikipedia:Notability does not degrade over time
- Wikipedia:Notability sub-pages (Notability subpages)
- Wikipedia:Notability/Historical/Arguments
- Wikipedia:Notable players (Notability sportsmen)
- Wikipedia:Not Now (advice for editors who launch premature requests for adminship in good faith)
- Wikipedia:Nothing
- Wikipedia:Nutshell (summary of 85 WP policy issues)
O
P
- Wikipedia:PLEASEDON'TSHOUT (use italics/bold not all caps)
- Wikipedia:Pancakes!
- Wikipedia:Parenthetical referencing
- Wikipedia:Partisanship (slanting, biased writing)
- Wikipedia:Per
- Wikipedia:Permastub (deadend articles, cannot expand stubs)
- Wikipedia:Personal information
- Wikipedia:Personal security practices
- Wikipedia:Philosophy
- Wikipedia:Photograph your hometown (personal photos/images)
- Wikipedia:Ping pong
- Wikipedia:Plain English (simplicity, simple wording)
- Wikipedia:Please clarify (clarification)
- Wikipedia:Please don't go psycho (anger, frustration)
- Wikipedia:Please use fullurl (webpages URL addresses)
- Wikipedia:Please use spellcheck (word spelling)
- Wikipedia:Pledges
- Wikipedia:Plot summaries (long plot summary)
- Wikipedia:Plus-one
- Wikipedia:Pocket Consensus (consensus building)
- Wikipedia:Pokémon test (notability)
- Wikipedia:Polarity
- Wikipedia:Policy doesn't override logic
- Wikipedia:Policy shopping (wikilawyering)
- Wikipedia:Political dispute
- Wikipedia:Politics
- Wikipedia:Pornography (nudity)
- Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state
- Wikipedia:Premeditated vandalism
- Wikipedia:Presentation
- Wikipedia:Presentations
- Wikipedia:Price information
- Wikipedia:Primary Secondary and Tertiary Sources
- Wikipedia:Priorities (priority)
- Wikipedia:Practical process (progress)
- Wikipedia:Process is important
- Wikipedia:Processes
- Wikipedia:Product, process, policy (policies)
- Wikipedia:Proseline
- Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy
- Wikipedia:Provenance (origins, background)
- Wikipedia:Pruning article revisions (avoiding extra edits, removing revisions)
- Wikipedia:Public transport
- Wikipedia:Publicity photos (images, copyright law)
- Wikipedia:Purpose (vision, mission statement)
- Wikipedia:Put a little effort into it (stubs need source/category)
Q
R
- Wikipedia:RFA reform
- Wikipedia:RFC/How to present a case (request for comments)
- Wikipedia:Read the archives
- Wikipedia:Reader Knows Nothing (readability)
- Wikipedia:Readers First (readability)
- Wikipedia:Reasonability Rule (readability)
- Wikipedia:Reasonableness (readability)
- Wikipedia:Recentism (excessive focus on news or trendy topics)
- Wikipedia:Recognise and respect competence (expert writers)
- Wikipedia:Recovering from Wikipediholism (humor)
- Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Redirects from foreign languages
- Wikipedia:Redlinks within reason, Bluelinks within context
- Wikipedia:Redundancy is good redundancy (repeated repetition)
- Wikipedia:Reference Desk philosophies
- Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners (ref-tag footnotes, references, notes)
- Wikipedia:Reform
- Wikipedia:Relevance (notability, tangents)
- Wikipedia:Relevance emerges
- Wikipedia:Relevance of content (notability, tangents)
- Wikipedia:Reliable source examples (reliability of sources)
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight (reliability of sources, slanting)
- Wikipedia:Removal of fair use images (photos, copyright law)
- Wikipedia:Replies to common objections
- Wikipedia:Reproposal tags
- Wikipedia:Researching Wikipedia (finding sources)
- Wikipedia:Resolving NPOV disputes (neutrality arguments)
- Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm (verbal attacks)
- Wikipedia:Responsibility
- Wikipedia:Responsible Editing Pledge
- Wikipedia:Responsible tagging (excessive tag boxes)
- Wikipedia:Restricted materials (banned subjects)
- Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary (edit wars, politeness)
- Wikipedia:Revert, block, ignore (vandalism)
- Wikipedia:Revocation of GFDL is not permitted (copyright law)
- Wikipedia:RfA Review
- Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question
- Wikipedia:RfA Review/Reflect
- Wikipedia:RfA cheatsheet
- Wikipedia:Rhetoric
- Wikipedia:Roll on the floor and laugh (humor)
- Wikipedia:Rollback for users (access to multiple revert)
- Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection (vandalism)
- Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill
S
T
- Wikipedia:Tag First (use of tag boxes)
- Wikipedia:Tag bombing (use of tag boxes)
- Wikipedia:Tag team
- Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems (use of tag boxes)
- Wikipedia:Take responsibility
- Wikipedia:Takeover
- Wikipedia:Taking it outside (moving long discussions to other pages)
- Wikipedia:Taking the road less traveled
- Wikipedia:Talk page formatting (talk-page issues)
- Wikipedia:Tar pit
- Wikipedia:Television article review process
- Wikipedia:Templates are lazy (excessive template usage)
- Wikipedia:Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Ten things you may not know about images on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law
- Wikipedia:Tendentious editing (slanting, biased writing)
- Wikipedia:Text move
- Wikipedia:Thank you
- Wikipedia:Thankspam (excessive revisions for thanking people)
- Wikipedia:That's why we preview, kids (excessive revisions for partial edits, fixing typos)
- Wikipedia:The Dumbledore principle
- Wikipedia:Wikipediology/library/essays/Merovingian-1
- Wikipedia:The Free Encyclopedia
- Wikipedia:The Hellboy2hell's guide to RfAs
- Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard
- Wikipedia:The Internet is not Serious Business
- Wikipedia:The Little Brother syndrome (blaming, shifting blame)
- Wikipedia:The Pope is Catholic (consider wide range of readers)
- Wikipedia:The Problem with Projects
- Wikipedia:The Truth
- Wikipedia:The WikiDoctor
- Wikipedia:The WikiMaster
- Wikipedia:The benefits of not requiring account creation on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:The benefits of requiring account creation on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:The first rule of Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:The grey zone (the gray zone)
- Wikipedia:The motivation of a vandal (vandalism)
- Wikipedia:The overuse of anonymity at Wikipedia and a proposal (IP addresses)
- Wikipedia:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
- Wikipedia:The rules are principles
- Wikipedia:The supreme, inviolate, pure virtue of humans
- Wikipedia:The world will not end tomorrow (slower pacing)
- Wikipedia:There is no common sense (common sense isn't common)
- Wikipedia:There is no community
- Wikipedia:There is no credential policy (expert writers)
- Wikipedia:There is no deadline (slower pacing)
- Wikipedia:Things you'll just have to learn to accept about Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Think tank
- Wikipedia:Thinking outside the infobox (example infoboxes, interwiki translation, quick infobox format)
- Wikipedia:Third-party sources
- Wikipedia:This is not an edit war (conflicts, content disputes)
- Wikipedia:Threats of violence (conflicts, attacks)
- Wikipedia:Throwing in the towel (quiting)
- Wikipedia:Time management
- Wikipedia:Translation/Overhaul
- Wikipedia:Threats of violence (conflicts, attacks)
- Wikipedia:Throwing in the towel (quiting)
- Wikipedia:Too long; didn't read (verbose, excessive description, long reply ignored)
- Wikipedia:Transclusion costs and benefits
- Wikipedia:Transparent deletion
- Wikipedia:Truce
- Wikipedia:Truth
- Wikipedia:Two-tier system (tier of verified/reviewed articles)
U
V
- Wikipedia:Vandalism types
- Wikipedia:Vandalism won by 2009
- Wikipedia:Vandals versus Trolls
- Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement
- Wikipedia:Veganism parable
W
- Wikipedia:WP:V is not a suicide pact
- Wikipedia:WTF? OMG! TMD TLA. ARG!
- Wikipedia:Walled garden ()
- Wikipedia:Watchlistitis (watching changed articles) (humor)
- Wikipedia:We CAN'T cover them all
- Wikipedia:We aren't Citizendium
- Wikipedia:We need more bureaucrats
- Wikipedia:Welcome anonymous editing (IP addresses)
- Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" really means
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia Should Be (vision, future, purpose)
- Wikipedia:What Would Britannica Do (encyclopedic)
- Wikipedia:What administrators do (work of admins)
- Wikipedia:What adminship is not
- Wikipedia:What claims of relevance are false
- Wikipedia:What isn't grounds for article deletion
- Wikipedia:What would Jack do?
- Wikipedia:When people complain rather than edit (gripes)
- Wikipedia:When to use the generic stub tag
- Wikipedia:Which talk page? (multiple talk-pages)
- Wikipedia:Why Heavy Bombers Are Not Useful Anymore
- Wikipedia:Why Santa Is Important (notability)
- Wikipedia:Why Self-Nominated RfA Candidates Could be more Competent
- Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great (faults/failures)
- Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great (benefits/successes)
- Wikipedia:Why can't I advertise my company or product on Wikipedia? (advertisements, ads)
- Wikipedia:Why dates should not be linked (overlinking for date format)
- Wikipedia:Why do you care?
- Wikipedia:Why on Earth would I want to contribute to a wiki
- Wikipedia:Why stable versions (reliability for readers)
- Wikipedia:Why to contribute
- Wikipedia:Why use Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Why you should be nice to people who vandalize
- Wikipedia:WhyNot? Doctrine
- Wikipedia:Wiki spirit
- Wikipedia:WikiAtheism (atheism, deism)
- Wikipedia:WikiCrime (vandalism, slanting)
- Wikipedia:WikiDalek
- Wikipedia:WikiHate
- Wikipedia:WikiLove
- Wikipedia:WikiPeace
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Arena Football League/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide
- Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Amateur
- Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Please Refrain from Spamming History AfDs during the season
- Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/West precedent
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Cue sports/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Cue sports/Spelling conventions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Event Venues/Sports task force/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Essay on writing film articles
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Original, authentic, and traditional
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Hello! Project/WP:H!P and the use of non-free images on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Player pages format
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Images of Muhammad
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Messianic Judaism/Memorandum of Understanding
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Style guide
- Wikipedia:WikiProject NASCAR/Standards
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Poker
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby league/Notability
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Anchors and tenants
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Manual of style
- Wikipedia:WikiProject reform
- Wikipedia:WikiRose
- Wikipedia:WikiSpeak
- Wikipedia:WikiTARDIS
- Wikipedia:WikiTerrorism (wikiterrorists attacking articles)
- Wikipedia:WikiViolence
- Wikipedia:WikiWar
- Wikipedia:Wikibreak (temporary breaks, multi-day vacation)
- Wikipedia:Wikilawyering (nitpicking policies, technicalities)
- Wikipedia:Wikiness
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia can be dangerous
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia does not care about the official name of anything
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia essays
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia in Schools
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a chatroom
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a community
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a tertiary source
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a work in progress
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is being flooded
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is failing (faults/criticism of Wikipedia)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is in the real world
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Google (NOTGOOGLE)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not TV (NOTTV)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a contest (NOTCONTEST)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a newspaper
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a social networking site
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a wine guide
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not aniconistic
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not just an encyclopedia (vision, purpose)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not pie
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not that important (priority)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not the Stanford Prison Experiment (humor)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé (vanity pages)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not therapy
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is succeeding (benefits/success of Wikipedia)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia may or may not be failing (benefits/success or faults of Wikipedia)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia should be fun (enjoyable effort)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia.org is a project to write an encyclopedia (vision, purpose, encyclopedic)
Duplicates
X
- (there were no essays with "X...")
Y
Z
See also
|
|
|
| Philosophy |
|
|
| Inclusion |
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
| Deletion |
|
|
| About essays |
|
|
|
|
|