Wifedogging

Wikipedia:CP

Welcome to our website. It is generaly simplier version of wikipedia. You will find there selected articles. Enjoy!

This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by DpmukBOT (talk) and will no longer be displayed when the backlog is cleared.
Noticeboards and related pages (Dashboard)
General
Content
User issues
Noticeboards
 Skip to bottom 
WP:CP redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, Wikipedia:Community portal, Wikipedia:Child protection, or Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
Wikipedia copyright
Policy
Guidelines
Processes
Resources
Shortcuts:

This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Wikipedia, including pages which are suspected to be copyright violations. Listings typically remain for at least five days before review and closure by a copyright problems clerk or administrator. During this time, interested contributors are invited to offer feedback about the problem at the relevant talk page, to propose revisions to the material, or to request copyright permission. After the listing period, a copyright problems board clerk or administrator will review the listing and take what further action may be necessary.

Articles listed for copyright review appear in the bottom section of the page. The top includes information for people who have copyright concerns about articles or images, for those whose articles have been tagged for concerns, for community volunteers who'd like to help resolve concerns and for the clerks and administrators who volunteer here.

If you believe a Wikipedia article has infringed on your copyright, please see special note below.
If an article you created has been marked as a copyright problem and you own copyright in the original publication (or have permission from the owner), please see this section.

Contents

Handling previously published text on Wikipedia

For more details on this topic, see Wikipedia:Copy-paste.

Under the United States law that governs Wikipedia, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or even claim copyright, for a copyright to exist.

Only one of the following allows works to be reused in Wikimedia projects:

A) Explicit Statement. An explicit statement (by the author, or by the holder of the rights to the work) that the material is either:

B) Public Domain. If the work is inherently in the public domain, due to its age or source; or

C) Fair Use. United States law allows for fair use of copyrighted content, and (within limits) Wikipedia does as well. Under guidelines for non-free content, brief selections of copyrighted text may be used, but only if clearly marked and with full attribution.

Even if a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, material should be properly attributed in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism. This is not only a matter of respecting local custom. When content is under a license that is compatible with Wikipedia's license, proper attribution may be required. If the terms of the compatible license are not met, use of the content can constitute a violation of copyright even if the license is compatible.

Repeated copyright violations

Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material (text or images) may be subject to contributor copyright investigations, to help ensure the removal from the project of all copyrighted material posted in contravention of policy. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing, to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512.

Backwards copying: when Wikipedia had (or may have had) it first

In some instances, it is clear that two pieces of text (one on Wikipedia, and one elsewhere) are copies of each other, but not clear which piece is the original and which is the copy. "Compliant" sites that copy Wikipedia text note that they have done so, but not all of our re-users are compliant.

If you've found such a case, you might first check the discussion page to see if a note has been added to the top of the talk page allay people's concerns. If not, you can look for clues. Do other pages in the other website copy other Wikipedia articles? Did the content show up on Wikipedia all in once piece, placed by a single editor? If you don't see good evidence that Wikipedia had it first, it's a good idea to bring it up for investigation. You might follow the Instructions for listing below or tag the article {{copy-paste|url=possible source}} so that others can evaluate. If you confirm definitely that the content was on Wikipedia first, please consider adding {{backwardscopy}} to the article's talk page with an explanation of how you know.

If you see an article somewhere else which was copied from Wikipedia without attribution, you might visit the CC-BY-SA compliance page or Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks.

Instructions for listing text-based copyright concerns

Shortcut:
Copyright owners: If you believe Wikipedia is infringing your copyright, you may request immediate removal of the copyright violation. Alternatively, you may contact Wikipedia's designated agent under the terms of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act. You are also welcome to follow the procedures here. See the copyright policy for more information.

Blatant infringement

Blatant copyright infringements may be speedily deleted if:

  • Content was copied from a source which does not have a license compatible with Wikipedia, and the content was copied from that source to Wikipedia and not the other way around (Wikipedia has numerous mirrors);
  • The page can neither be restored to a previous revision without infringing content, nor would the page be viable if the infringing content were removed.
  • There is no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license.

To nominate an article for speedy deletion for copyright concerns, add one of these to the page:

Both of these templates will generate a notice that you should give the contributor of the content. This is important to help ensure that they do not continue to add copyrighted content to Wikipedia. An administrator will examine the article and decide whether to delete it or not. You should not blank the page in this instance.

Suspected or complicated infringement

If infringement is not blatant or the speedy deletion criteria do not apply:

  • Remove the infringing text or revert the page to a non-copyrighted version if you can.
    The infringing text will remain in the page history for archival reasons unless the copyright holder asks the Wikimedia Foundation to remove it (unless it is tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}. Please note the reason for removal in the edit summary and at the article's talk page (you may wish to use {{subst:cclean}}). When possible, please identify and alert the contributor of the material to the problem. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose.
  • However, if all revisions have copyright problems, the removal of the copyright problem is contested, or reversion/removal is otherwise complicated:
  • Replace the text with one of the following:

    {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}

    {{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}

  • Go to today's section and add

    * {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~

    to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you)
  • Advise the contributor of the material at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.

Instructions for special cases

  • Probable copyvios without a known source: If you suspect that an article contains a copyright violation, but you cannot find a source for the violation (so you can't be sure that it's a violation), do not list it here. Instead, place {{cv-unsure|~~~|2=FULL_URL}} on the article's talk page, but replace FULL_URL with the full URL of the article version that you believe contains a violation. (To determine the URL, click on "Permanent link" in the toolbox area, and copy the URL.)
  • Instances where one contributor has verifiably introduced copyright problems into multiple articles or files and assistance is needed in further review: See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.

Instructions for handling image copyright concerns

For more details on this topic, see Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion.

Image copyright concerns are not handled on this board. For images that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; list images that are suspected to be copyright violations at possibly unfree images and images with disputed fair use rationales at Non-free content review. To request assistance with contributors who have infringed copyright in multiple articles or files, see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.

Responding to articles listed for copyright investigation

Copyright owners and people editing on their behalf or with their permission, please see below.

Any contributor is welcome to help investigate articles listed for copyright concerns, although only administrators, copyright problems board clerks, and OTRS team members should remove {{copyvio}} tags and mark listings resolved.

Assistance might include supplying evidence of non-infringement (or, conversely, of infringement) or obtaining and verifying permission of license. You might also help by rewriting problematic articles.

Supplying evidence of non-infringement

Articles are listed for copyright investigation because contributors have reason to suspect they constitute a copyright concern, but not every article listed here is actually a copyright problem. Sometimes, the content was on Wikipedia first. Sometimes, the article is public domain or compatibly licensed. Sometimes, the person who placed it here is the copyright owner and this simply needs to be verified.

If you can provide information to prove license or public domain status of the article, please do. It doesn't matter if you do it under the listing for the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article; a link or a clear explanation can be very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the matter. (As listings are not immediately addressed on the board, it may take a few days after you make your note before response is provided.)

If the article is tagged for {{copyvio}}, you should allow an administrator or copyright problems clerk to remove the tag. If the article is tagged for {{copy-paste}} or {{close paraphrasing}}, you may remove the tag from the article when the problem is addressed (or disproven), but please do not close the listing on the copyright problems board itself.

Obtaining/verifying permission

Sometimes material was placed on Wikipedia with the permission of the copyright owner. Sometimes copyright owners are willing to give permission (and proper license!) even if it was not.

Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!). See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. In either case, unless a statement authorizing the material under compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, permission will need to be confirmed through e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation. See Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing for the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article.

Please note that it may take a few days for letters to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged.

Rewriting content

Any contributor may rewrite articles that are or seem to be copyight problems to exclude duplicated or closely paraphrased text. When articles or sections of articles are blanked as copyright problems, this is done on a temporary page at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. (The template blanking the article will link to the specific temporary page.)

Please do not copy over the version of the article that is a copyright problem as your base. All copied content, or material derived from it, should be removed first. Other content from the article can be used, if there is no reason to believe that it may be a copyright issue as well. It is often a good idea - and essential when the content is copied from an inaccessible source such as a book - to locate the point where the material entered the article and eliminate all text added by that contributor. This will help avoid inadvertently continuing the copyright issues in your rewrite. If you use any text at all from the earlier version of the article, please leave a note at the talk page of the article to alert the administrator or clerk who addresses the listing. The history of the old article will then have to be retained. (If the original turns out to be non-infringing, the two versions of the article can be merged.)

Rewrites can be done directly in articles that have been tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} and {{copy-paste}}, with those tags removed after the rewrite is complete.

Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and the linked guidelines and policies within it if necessary to review Wikipedia's practices for handling non-free text. Reviewing Wikipedia:Plagiarism is also helpful, particularly where content is compatibly licensed or public domain. Repairing these issues can sometimes be as simple as supplying proper attribution.

Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia (or people editing on their behalf)

Policy shortcut:

If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, then stating on the article's talk page that you are the copyright holder of the work (or acting as his or her agent), while not likely to prevent deletion, helps. To completely resolve copyright concerns, it is sufficient to either:

See also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

Please note that it may take a bit of time for letters and e-mails to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged. Your e-mail will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.

One other factor you should consider, however, is that content that has been previously published elsewhere may not meet Wikipedia's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially the core policies that govern the project. This may help prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.

Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.

Information about the people who process copyright problems listed on the board

Copyright problems board clerks

For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Clerks.

Copyright problems board clerks are experienced editors on Wikipedia who have demonstrated familiarity with Wikipedia's approach to non-free text and its processes for dealing with them. They are trusted to evaluate and close listings, although their closures may sometimes require completion by administrators, when use of administrative tools is required. Clerks are periodically reviewed by the administrators who work in copyright areas on Wikipedia.

Copyright problems board administrators

For a more complete description of administrators on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Administrators.

Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. Working the copyright problems board may involve evaluating listings personally or using tools as necessary to complete closures by clerks. Clerks have been evaluated in their work, and their recommendations may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review recommendations and discuss them with the clerks in question.

Closing listings

Pages should stay listed for a minimum of 5 days before they are checked and processed by copyright problems board clerks, 7 days before they are checked or processed by administrators, who close the daily listings. OTRS agents who verify images may close listings at any time.

For advice for resolving listings, see:

The templates collected at Template:CPC may be useful for administrators, clerks and OTRS agents noting resolution.

Listings of possible copyright problems

Very old issues

Older than 7 days

Below are articles that have been listed here for longer than 7 days. At this point, they may be processed by any administrator (see WP:CPAA). When every ticket on a day is clear, the day may be removed.

28 March 2012

Reviewed

SCV for 2012-03-28 Edit

2012-03-28 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. — madman 17:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
  • There's something a bit odd about this batch of camogie articles, which appear to have been created by three new users editing sequentially roughly between 4-5am GMT. Only one overlapping edit (time-wise) that I can see. I don't think there is a copyright concern as these are articles on annual contests and there is a similarity of style, phrasing and format which tends to be the case with this sort of article. But I think it might be worth someone else having a look before these are marked as OK.--CharlieDelta (talk) 10:46, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. — madman 17:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Cut and paste move redirected already CharlieDelta (talk) 10:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Article redirected back and forth to correct title punctuation per MOS CharlieDelta (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Article tagged for speedy deletion. Tagged for CSD G4. Copyvio text appears to have been removed CharlieDelta (talk) 11:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Content split without discussion or attribution. Attribution now added and notes left on both article Talk pages and with the contributor. CharlieDelta (talk) 08:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
  • The tag has been removed, as no source was identified and I found nothing in spot-checks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This looks like a potential CCI in the making. I've left a strong warning. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Ocaasi:

  • Pictogram voting question.svg Issue resolved. Didn't find anything that was a concern here although I did re-write one sentence, which although I don't think it was a problem, was closer to the source than it needed to be. --Dpmuk (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Note that Gabriel Cousens was drastically condensed by other editors and I no longer think there are any significant close paraphrasing issues. Ocaasi t | c 19:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I'd agree that this has changed significantly enough that any concerns about your contributions should be gone. --Dpmuk (talk) 20:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I think this is largely fine but I've let Ocaasi know that there are two sentences which I think could do with a re-write although they're probably border line cases. Dpmuk (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Have just rewrote those two sentences myself --Dpmuk (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm requesting a review of articles I recently wrote after some editors expressed concerns about close paraphrasing.

I've tagged these articles with {{close paraphrasing}}, and would appreciate a neutral set of eyes to examine them. Thank you for your help. Ocaasi t | c 14:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

  • I need to recuse myself from this request as I am currently working with Ocaasi in my staff capacity. (And have been for some weeks.) I don't believe that I have a bias, but if I find that there are no issues, others might feel differently. I don't think I'd need to recuse myself from volunteer involvement with Ocaasi forever, but so long as we're actively working together it seems best. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:40, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
  • I've started working through Kamal Abbas. It has many, many reference so it not a quick process. I'll try and get through all of these over the next few days. Dpmuk (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
That article was thoroughly worked over for its DYK nomination. I think that it's actually clear of close paraphrasing issues now, thanks to the work of User:Nikkimaria; link to DYK discussion. Ocaasi t | c 22:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
That link refers to Khaled Ali. As far as I can see Kamal Abbas has never been nominated for DYK. Dpmuk (talk) 05:38, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry. Totally incorrect on my part. Ocaasi t | c 16:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm a bit burnt out on these at the moment so going to give them a break for a while. If anyone else wants to take them on in the mean time please feel free! Dpmuk (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

6 May 2012

Everything under collapse addressed

SCV for 2012-05-06 Edit

2012-05-06 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 23:14, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Apparently published 1913-1914 Monty845 23:21, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Monty845 23:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 23:14, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. But there was copying, from another source, which I've removed. :) Thank you for bringing it up for review! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Out of date clock icon.svg User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

8 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-08 Edit

2012-05-08 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 00:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Monty845 16:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. Monty845 16:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • The copied language is pretty minimal, probably not actionable. Tweaked the wording a bit, but there is still one phrase that appears copied. Monty845 16:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting move.svg Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. section blanked, general claim of Public Domain, but I can't find evidence to that effect Monty845 16:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Article creator has agreed to removal of the text pending additional research to establish if its public domain. Monty845 20:55, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. :( --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 01:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

9 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-09 Edit

2012-05-09 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 00:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. Monty845 17:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting wait red.svg Cut and paste move, history merge requested or needed. Monty845 00:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 00:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Monty845 17:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 00:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 00:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Copied to start new year article, attribution fixed Monty845 00:06, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 00:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

11 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-11 Edit

2012-05-11 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. article split, attribution edit summary and templates added Monty845 15:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Monty845 17:57, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Use of old season as template for new one, attribution templates/edit summary added Monty845 15:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

  • This is an WP:IEP article. MER-C 03:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

End. MER-C 01:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

12 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-12 Edit

2012-05-12 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Monty845 18:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. Monty845 14:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Infringing version deleted G12, new version does not appear to be a vio Monty845 18:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting wait red.svg Cut and paste move, history merge requested or needed. Monty845 15:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Histmerge completed. Monty845 14:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Monty845 18:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. Monty845 14:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 10:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

13 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-13 Edit

2012-05-13 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Removed the most blatant copyvio text, there is still some left that is borderline, tagged and BLPPRODed. Monty845 18:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Tagged by OTRS agent indicating permission. Monty845 18:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 18:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 18:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. Looks like it was copied from another article on Wikipedia, redirect to source Monty845 18:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • After discussion with the article author, they have removed the text pending further research on its copyright status. Monty845 20:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 00:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

New listings

Entries in this section are newer than 7 days and should not be closed by an administrator. This gives time for the original authors of the article to deal with the problem.

Older than 5 days

Below are articles that have been listed here for longer than 5 days. At this point, they may be processed by a copyright problems board clerk. After 7 days, they may be closed by an administrator.

14 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-14 Edit

2012-05-14 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Monty845 14:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting move.svg Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Monty845 14:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. Material appropriately licensed for use. Tagged by OTRS agent indicating permission. SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Tagged by OTRS agent indicating permission. SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

15 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-15 Edit

2012-05-15 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Monty845 00:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Similarity due to multiple year event, and standardized opening paragraph SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Attribution templates added. Monty845 14:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Recent listings

Below are articles that have been listed here for 5 days or less. Anyone in the community may help clarify the copyright status on these. See the section on responding for more information.

16 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-16 Edit

2012-05-16 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Redirected. MER-C 12:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • The WISE objects above are all cookie cutter articles. MER-C 12:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Copy and paste move fixed. MER-C 12:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Monty845 14:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Tony Vincent (history · last edit). Most of the content of The Voice section also appears word-for-word at a fansite, http://teamtonyvincent.com/fr_news.cfm (with a clear copyright notice). I considered reverting the first edit but the content was originally added to the article starting in late February 2012, there have been many edits since then, untangling the good edits from the apparently not-good edits is somewhat problematic especially since the timeline of content-creation is somewhat unclear (which came from which...). I placed tags on that section but would appreciate additional expertise on this. Shearonink (talk) 21:16, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Maiden City Festival (history · last edit) from http://www.borderireland.info/info/adetail.php?aref=4394 Doopa (talk) 22:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

17 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-17 Edit Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2012-05-17

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Sound masking - there are assertions on the talk page that this article may have been pasted from another source. I am not sure whether, for example, 'The Acoustical Society of America' is a public domain website, or whether any material was copied from here or elsewhere. A response back to me would be appreciated. I would not want to copyedit it and mess up a possible COPVIO. --Greenmaven (talk) 02:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Deborah Lurie (history · last edit) from http://www.deborahlurie.com/fr_biography.cfm. This is not the first time this article has been reported for pasting the text from that URL; I have seen no evidence that permission has since been provided. — Paul A (talk) 04:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 06:14, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

18 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-18 Edit

2012-05-18 (Suspected copyright violations)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Chile–Philippines relations (history · last edit) from http://chileabroad.gov.cl/filipinas/en/relacion-bilateral/relaciones-bilaterales/. LibStar (talk) 07:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

19 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-19 Edit

2012-05-19 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Redirected. MER-C 02:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Redirected. MER-C 02:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Redirected. MER-C 02:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Similarity due to list of awards, perhaps, or further reading matching publications SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Similarity due to multiple mixtapes, and standardized opening paragraph SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 02:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

20 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-20 Edit

2012-05-20 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Sole contributor performed cut/paste move, no action needed. Monty845 22:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting wait red.svg Cut and paste move, history merge requested or needed. Monty845 22:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Sole contributor performed cut/paste move, no action needed. Monty845 22:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting wait red.svg Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. Monty845 22:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Sole contributor performed cut/paste move, no action needed. Monty845 22:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Content is clearly copied. Source has an unusual license [2], it could be interpreted as placing all the contents in the public domain, but it is less then clear. Monty845 22:27, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

21 May 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-21 Edit

2012-05-21 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Triggered by a bunch of song titles in a list Monty845 04:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting wait red.svg Cut and paste move, history merge requested or needed. Monty845 04:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to non-infringing article. Monty845 16:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Currently tagged G7 after author blanked. Monty845 16:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Supriya Sule (history · last edit) from http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sule-used-fathers-influence-to-hide-assets-information/902255. --Stfg (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Footer

Wikipedia's current date is May 21, 2012. Put new article listings in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 May 21. Images should be handled by speedy deletion, possibly unfree files or Wikipedia:Non-free content review.



Advertisement. Check our sponsors: gold
Thanks for your time.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License